Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have found themselves at the center of controversy after their recent volunteer work during the Los Angeles wildfires. The visit has been labeled as a mere photo opportunity by some, prompting a heated debate about their intentions.
During their time at an evacuation center, the couple dressed in plain clothes, interacted with victims, and engaged with other volunteers. They have been criticized for using the situation for publicity rather than offering genuine help. Images of the couple smiling and conversing with locals have served to reinforce this view among their detractors.

Their visit was captured in a series of photos, showing the former royals laughing and talking with victims, many of whom were eager to meet them. While some people requested selfies, Harry and Meghan appeared happy to comply, further fueling criticism of their motives.

Justine Bateman, among other critics, expressed disdain for their actions, likening them to ‘ambulance chasers’ more interested in self-promotion than community aid. “What a repulsive photo op they achieved. Are they touring the damage or are they acting like they are politicians of the state now?” Bateman asked rhetorically online, echoing a sentiment shared by many.

Some observers have also pointed out that Harry and Meghan do not reside in the area permanently, leading to additional questions about their involvement and intentions. To some, this categorizes them as ‘tourists’ in a time of crisis.
Footage of their interactions shows the exact moment Harry and Meghan talked to volunteers and the city’s mayor, trying to offer as much support as possible. Despite these efforts, skepticism lingers for some, especially with Meghan’s upcoming Netflix show raising suspicions about possible ulterior motives.