During his recent oath-taking ceremony, Donald Trump caught the attention of many across America as he noticeably refrained from placing his hand on either of the two Bibles positioned beside him. The two Bibles in question were significant: one was a family heirloom provided by his mother, and the other was the historical Lincoln Bible. Despite First Lady Melania Trump standing next to him holding these sacred books, Trump opted to keep his hands to himself, declining to touch them during the solemn moment.

This choice did not escape the public eye, sparking global discussions about whether this act was deliberately planned or an oversight during the ceremonial proceedings. Supporters of Trump have put forward the explanation that the ceremony faced timing pressure, resulting in a sequence of rushed actions as the event fell behind schedule. In contrast, critics believe this was a deliberate deviation from established tradition, prompting further speculation.

Throughout the ceremony, Trump stood composed with his left arm by his side while raising his right hand to formally take the oath of office. This small gesture—or lack thereof—has raised eyebrows, causing people to question if this signifies a shift away from presidential conventions.

Some individuals have pointed blame towards Chief Justice John Roberts, suggesting that the delay in the ceremony’s progression led to hurried proceedings, including Trump’s choice to neglect placing his hand on the Bibles, as everyone strove to get back on schedule promptly.

The buzz surrounding this act has been substantial, leaving citizens across the nation pondering both the implications and motivations behind this unusual occurrence during such a pivotal moment.